Skip to content
Services · Done-for-you

ADA website remediation: we find it, fix it, and prove it

Most providers do one part of this. Audit-only firms hand you a list. Fix-only shops leave no record. Scan-only tools leave the work to you. Our website accessibility remediation service does all four: audit every page, fix the violations in your own code and documents, prove it with dated evidence and a VPAT, and keep monitoring so it stays fixed.

Sample page F · 41
<img> missing alt text alt="Students on the quad at sunset"
Body text contrast

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.

2.8:1, fails 1.4.3 7.1:1, passes AA & AAA
unnamed button aria-label="Apply now" 4.1.2 fail 4.1.2 pass
WCAG 2.2 AA findings
  • 1.1.1 Non-text content
  • 1.4.3 Contrast (minimum)
  • 2.4.4 Link purpose
  • 4.1.2 Name, role, value
  • 2.1.1 Keyboard
Time to remediate
Template-level, clears every page at once

Drag the toggle or watch it run: the same page, before and after a remediation pass.

How an engagement runs

From audit to documented proof

01

Audit every page

We run GuardGrid across all your properties to establish a full, severity-ranked picture of every accessibility issue, down to the failing element.

02

Fix the templates first

Most sites carry the bulk of their violations in a handful of reusable templates and components. We fix those first, so one change clears every page that uses them.

03

Remediate content and PDFs

We work through page-level and document-level issues, including the PDF library most scanners never open.

04

Verify and prove it

We re-scan to confirm each fix, then hand you the evidence trail: scores, before and after, VPAT, and a dated compliance record.

Why this combination

Audit, fix, prove, monitor

Most of the market sells one of these four. The gaps between them are where accessibility programs stall.

Audit

The platform

GuardGrid crawls every page and every linked document, grades each property A to F weighted by severity, and names the exact failing element and the criterion it breaks. Audit-only firms stop at a PDF list. This one updates itself.

Fix

Our engineers

A person from Revion Solutions works in your codebase, CMS, and document library and changes the source. This is the part no scanner does, ours included, and it is the part that actually removes the barrier.

Prove

The platform

VPAT 2.5, Compliance Evidence PDFs, a publishable accessibility statement, and a dated score history, all generated from real scans. Fix-only providers leave you with a better site and no record of how it got that way.

Monitor

The platform

Scheduled scans and alerts on score drops and new critical violations. A point-in-time audit goes stale the day after delivery, because new content reintroduces violations continuously.

One boundary worth stating plainly, because the market blurs it constantly: the GuardGrid platform finds, documents, and tracks. It does not rewrite your code, generate corrected markup, or write changes back into your CMS, and nothing is injected into your pages at runtime. The hands-on fixing on this page is human work, delivered by Revion Solutions, Incorporated engineers. If a vendor tells you a product makes a site conformant on its own, that claim is the thing to interrogate. The W3C is direct about the limits of automation in its guidance on evaluating accessibility: no tool alone can determine whether a site meets accessibility standards.

What's included

A complete WCAG remediation program

Scoped to your site, your CMS, your document library, and your deadline. We give you the plan and the number after we have seen a real baseline, not before.

  • WCAG remediation to 2.2 AA across every property you run
  • Template and theme-level fixes for maximum leverage
  • PDF and document accessibility remediation
  • Each fix mapped to the WCAG success criterion it satisfies
  • Re-scan verification on every fix, so nothing is assumed
  • VPAT 2.5 and a dated evidence package for auditors, legal, and leadership
  • Continuous monitoring afterwards, so the grade does not quietly slip
What remediation looks like

From failing grade to documented compliance

Remediation shows up as a score history, not a certificate. Template work moves the number quickly, then the curve flattens as the work reaches one-off pages, custom widgets, and documents. The illustration below shows that shape; your actual pace depends on your baseline and the size of your document library.

Compliance score
41 +55 pts

Illustrative shape of a template-first remediation program. Not a guarantee or a client result.

0 25 50 75 100 BaselineMonth 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5
96%
of errors WebAIM found in 2026 came from just six failure types, nearly all template-level
Scoped
timeline and price quoted from your real baseline, never before it
Every fix
re-scanned to verify, so nothing is assumed
WCAG 2.2
AA criteria mapped to each remediation
Common questions

What teams ask before starting

What is ADA website remediation?

ADA website remediation is the work of finding accessibility barriers on a site and correcting them in the source: the HTML, CSS, JavaScript, templates, content, and documents your server actually delivers. It is different from an audit, which only identifies problems, and different from an overlay, which adjusts what a visitor browser renders without changing what you publish.

How long does website accessibility remediation take?

It depends on how many reusable templates your site uses and how large your document library is, so we scope from a real baseline scan rather than quoting a number up front. What is predictable is the shape of the work: template-level fixes clear a large share of page-level violations early, then progress slows as the work moves into one-off pages, custom widgets, and PDFs. We give you a scoped plan before anything starts.

Do you touch our code?

Yes, that is the service. Our engineers work directly in your stack, whether that is a templated CMS, a static site, or a custom application, and prioritize theme and template fixes so corrections propagate across every page that uses them. Nothing is injected into your pages at runtime and nothing depends on a subscription staying active to keep working.

Do we get proof of compliance?

You get a dated evidence trail generated from real scans: per-criterion fixes, before-and-after scores, a VPAT 2.5, Compliance Evidence PDFs, a publishable accessibility statement, and a score history. No honest provider certifies a large site as permanently compliant, because conformance is a moving target on a site that keeps publishing. What the record does show is an active, documented, good-faith program, which is what counsel and procurement reviewers ask to see. This is documentation, not legal advice.

Do you cover PDFs and other documents?

Yes. Documents are in scope and on institutional sites they are frequently the largest untracked liability. We handle text-layer recovery on scanned files, tag structure, reading order, alternative text, table headers, and form field labels, and we will tell you when a document would be better converted to an accessible web page instead of remediated.

Does the GuardGrid platform fix things automatically?

No, and this is worth being precise about. GuardGrid pinpoints the exact failing element, maps it to the WCAG criterion it breaks, shows it in place on a screenshot of the page, and tracks it from open to fixed. It does not rewrite your code or write changes back to your CMS. The hands-on fixing is this service: a Revion Solutions engineer makes the change in your codebase and re-scans to verify it.

Can we keep using GuardGrid after the project?

Most clients do. New content reintroduces violations, so continuous scanning catches regressions the next time someone ships a page or updates a template, and the evidence trail stays current instead of going stale the day the engagement ends.

What we work to

The standard, and the documents most providers skip

We remediate to WCAG 2.2 Level AA, which is backward compatible with the WCAG 2.1 AA standard named in the Department of Justice Title II rule, so meeting 2.2 also satisfies 2.1. Public entities serving populations of 50,000 or more face an April 26, 2027 compliance date, and smaller entities and special districts April 26, 2028, per the DOJ fact sheet on the web and mobile app rule. Each fix we make is mapped to the specific success criterion it satisfies in the W3C's How to Meet WCAG reference.

Documents are first-class scope here, not an afterthought. On higher-education and government sites the PDF library is routinely the largest untracked liability: catalogs, board minutes, program sheets, and forms accumulated over decades, mostly untagged, and scanned files that carry no text layer at all. We handle text-layer recovery, tag structure, reading order, alternative text, table headers, and form field labels, and we will tell you when a document would be better rebuilt as an accessible web page than remediated in place.

Before you scope a project

Start with a baseline. Run a free scan so the conversation starts from your real numbers. If you are still deciding what class of tool or provider you need, our comparison of ADA compliance tools lays out the categories honestly, including where we are not the right answer.

Let's scope your remediation

Tell us about your properties, your CMS, and your deadline. We will review your site and come back with a plan and a quote. No obligation.